I’m using Tae Kim as a guide for grammar alongside Bunpro and i’m getting conflicting messages. Using other resources is just confusing me even more.
So i’m hoping someone here can clear this up for me, please.
According to Tae Kim Potential forms do not have direct objects.
The example is: 富士山を登られた, this is incorrect and 富士山が登られた
Is more natural (the book ommits the 'ら’).
However the Bunpro example sentence is: やっとシャワーを浴びられる, in this example wouldn’t やっとシャワーが浴びられる demonstrate that a shower was possible but at this moment no actual action is taken?
Thanks for reading my post and all help is greatly appreciated!