I use Bunpro solely for grammar practice, so that might influence how you perceive this post. I believe Bunpro is a high-quality tool, but I think the synonym/partially correct/yellow system could use some improvement. While it’s great that the Bunpro team is focusing on enhancing vocabulary and reading practice, these features don’t benefit me since I practice them elsewhere.
Most Bunpro users review grammar, and many likely encounter several synonym answers in each session. I think some standardization or additional work on the system could improve the user experience. Here’s how I see the current issues:
-
Sometimes, Bunpro just informs you there’s a synonym or a stronger/weaker nuance. This is fine, but it leaves you guessing between six or more synonyms for some grammar points. A bit more guidance would be helpful, though I understand this might be a lot of work for the Bunpro team and is likely impractical.
-
Occasionally, there’s a grammar point that I think fits, but it’s not recognized as a synonym. In these cases, I’d appreciate an explanation of why it’s wrong, but instead, I’m just marked as incorrect with no guidance. It would be nice to have a way to report these instances so the Bunpro team can confirm whether it’s a valid synonym or not. I realize this could overwhelm the team with incorrect reports, but some kind of middle ground would be helpful.
-
Sometimes, there’s a hint that is actively misleading, which is the most frustrating experience as a user.
-
The best-case scenario is when Bunpro provides specific advice on how to correct your answer to get it right.
Implementing these changes wouldn’t be easy, but as a grammar teaching and SRS tool, having to guess why “なくてはいけません” is wrong and “なければいけません” is right makes for a poor user experience. I think somehow improving this system is currently the single greatest improvement the team could make to Bunpro overall.