Was it a bad idea to also review WaniKani vocab within Bunpro?

Thanks for reading me! :pray: Hope you had fun learning some Japanese today :sparkles:

TLDR: I’m considering unlinking Bunpro and Wanikani, or at least configure Bunpro to stop reviewing the vocab I learned on Wanikani (if that’s possible). And I’m wondering what you guys think about this (hence the poll).


Here’s the looong rationale:

On Wanikani I get a lot of reviews and I’m usually racing through it because they’re just “word:translation” or “kanji:reading” pairs. The stated goal of WK is to get fluent reading kanji so in that way I like going fast as it’s kind of the end goal. I take note of my mistakes of course and I go slower on specific kanji/vocab if I feel there is something that requires special attention.

In this case quantity isn’t a problem: I may have hundreds of reviews on a specific day but I’ll get through it rather quickly and at the end of the review session I feel like I’ve done my job: refreshed memories in my brain, wrote down my errors so I can understand them and correct them later.

On Bunpro however, I would like to go at a slower pace and take more time to read: read the sentences in the review, re-read the grammar points to make sure I fully understand how to use them. Read the alternative answers. Basically quality over quantity, where I don’t mind doing less and going slow as long as it sticks.
For this reason, I have set up Bunpro to ignore vocab lessons and just serve me a few grammar points every day.

But lately I’ve noticed that since I linked WK and BP, Bunpro makes me review a lot of WK vocab. It mostly comes through in waves but I’d say a good portion of my BP review queue is just “WK vocab”.

I initially thought this was nice, because I get more repetition thus better memorization. And also the words are served in the context of a sentence, helping me to better understand the meaning, or to make sure a verb is godan or ichidan etc.

But this has many downsides: first it creates a significant quantity of reviews (woke up to 256 reviews on BP yesterday) which can either discourage me or make me spend less time learning new things. But most importantly, it’s making my mind think fast rather than slow and I end up reading just the highlighted word without bothering with the sentence. So quite a few perceived downsides:

  1. It makes me skip the sentence so less global understanding of japanese.
  2. Because I skip reading the sentence I make more grammar errors which ends up being frustrating.
  3. I ultimately spend less time reading the grammar points, as I want to clear my review queue first because I’m afraid of the numbers getting bigger :scream: and I’m often out of time or energy after dealing with the review queue.

I’ve tried to force my brain to go slower but it’s not working. So I’m considering dropping WK vocab from Bunpro so I can have less reviews, and taking it nice and slow going more deeply into each review sentence.

I’m probably forgetting something but this post is already long enough. I’m curious to know if you’ve had similar issues and how you went about solving them. And in general, how does your brain approach Bunpro reviews altogether?

See you next year I guess! :fireworks: :tulip: :bamboo:

  • I should keep reviewing WK vocab in BP
  • I should use BP only for grammar points, at a slower pace

0 voters

I don’t use WK, so my opinion may not be that important, BUT I know: sometimes less is more :wink: I don’t know how you learn beside WK and BP, but I would separate both and instead concentrate even more on mistakes and diffcult vocab/grammar OR just use the time for reading instead. Not reading sentences but texts of course. Because that’s also a kind of review with other benefits.
I have more or less the same problem with Marugoto. I started learning with Anki and then found BP and thought it would be great to learn the Marugoto deck the same time (because I’m insecure with my memory it seems :thinking:), also because BP has sentences, my Anki deck does not. But I just have more reviews now that I don’t really need (yes insecurity, I DON’T NEED THEM!) AND mostly ignore the sentences… maybe I’m not ready for them (too much unkown vocabs), maybe my brain just want to have vocabs OR texts and not single sentences, who knows :woman_shrugging:

It has been a few years since I finished WK, so things may have changed but IIRC WK doesn’t give vocab in context or with any example sentences.

I started over to Bunpro around midway through WK and started doing cloze reviews for vocab and immediately realized I was constantly not able to recall the N5/N4 vocab I had studied on WK.

It depends on your goals and possibly your learning style, but I ended up starting from scratch on vocab from N5 onwards with Bunpro.

If it makes you spend less time in general there is no doubt that you should drop it, and focus on what you like for better efficiency.

On the other hand I think it’s very bad approach to learn 6k words with just word/translation structure, it’s very shallow.
Words are usually glued with context and randomness in encounters rather then with brute force. But if you really work with your mistakes (writing down, creating sentences, looking up sentences for words you fail to understand their nuances) it should be fine.

I have a few thoughts on this.

First increased workload has indeed the risk of burnout. I’ve gotten thousands of reviews on both platforms and getting them down again is possible but a severe pain.

However wk srs by itself will have you fail stuff often, because you don’t see them a lot. This will in turn also make you lazy because seeing the same thing and failing it for the nth time also feels bad and is NG

For reading a whole sentence and caring about it bunpro might be better than wk but it’s still not good. You get that with immersion. The lazyness you notice now will only get worse in my experience as you start repeatedly seeing old stuff.

Not to say that your time on wk or bunpro isn’t well spent. It’s good for the initial learning. But seeing the stuff in the wild, recognizing them and “reviewing” them that way beats everything else.

1 Like