Thank you! It came faster than I had expected, haha. Cheers!
Cloze-style audio grammar reviews!
I would love to be able to do my grammar reviews “listening first”.
This would be quite a big update, because it would require a second version of the audio for every example sentence, with the target word blanked or beeped out. Quite an undertaking, but I imagine an AI tool could help.
It would also require a rework of the nuance/hint display order. Ideally the first thing I would see, when incrementally adding hints, is the Japanese sentence with everything but the target word.
This is just a minor thing, but when you undo your answer the options are to delete the whole answer or just the last character. Most of the time I mistype in the middle of my answer so I currently delete the last character, type it again and then fix the mistake. It would be nice if an option was just not to change anything and let me click on where the mistake is. I think on the app I can already do this.
Grammar point suggestion (I can’t find the missing grammar points thread anymore…? is it gone?)
not sure if it’s worth it. But I’m making the suggestion based on the fact I’ve encountered it in immersion (mostly on social media/live streams, rather than in any professionally produced media such as anime)
I’ve seen ド as a prefix attached to other things to emphasize absolute / extreme / no debate of “something”, so I read ド田舎 as very remote country side / absolute backwater.
I’ve also seen ド真ん中 or ド下手 and a few others.
resources I found
However I don’t actually understand (based on those resources) if it’s even productive enough to warrant a grammar point
An option to cram missed vocab words right out of a review session would be awesome. Also, い adjective (predicate) could use the vocab in parentheses, I haven’t learned all of the vocab it wants me to use for that one yet. Thank you.
Here you go!
It is most common with the examples you gave. I think this one doesn’t come up as “JLPT Grammar” (isn’t tested explicitly on the JLPT), so if we were to add it then it would likely be non-JLPT.
I’ll put it in the consideration list for the moment. Cheers!
Hello! This might exist already, and I just don’t know where to find it, but-
Could we have special deck that is full of our non deck items?
What I mean is, I often add things to my queue by search that are not JLPT items so aren’t in any of the JLPT decks I study. I wish I had made myself a “plus” deck or something so I could keep track of them. The reason for this is that when I have many reviews, I study them exclusively from the deck page. That means that I can’t locate my non deck items as a group and study them as a group. If I want to catch up on them, I have to clear my whole queue, which I don’t always do. I would like the ability to easily review them in the way I review cards from the deck page.
Sorry if this doesn’t make sense…
Is it possible to learn vocabulary by frequency?
On PC, if I have furigana turned off, could there be an option to reveal it once the answer has been marked correctly? Highlighting over individual words is a pain to check if I did the reading right compared to on my phone. (Specifically for reading.)
This is so funny because I have the opposite problem. On PC it automatically shows the furigana if the answer is correct, but on my phone it does not show it unless I hover…
When I’m learning new Grammar Points I have Problems to remember them. Would it be possible to add the Option to do more than Just one Sentence during “start Quiz” without adding all Sentences to the Reviews at once? Like an integrated cram funktion.
To be able to filter in a vocab deck the Mastered elements, being able to sort the words from most common to less common in a vocab deck.
B-Points Shop: Show what I can afford
@Sean and @Jake, I have an idea for the B-Point Shop: Add an optional filter/category for “I have enough B-Points”. For example, I have 10,665 B-Points right now. Clicking this optional filter/category would show only the items I can afford. Thanks! 
Hello, I think it would be useful to be able to review grammar and vocab by level instead of deck. For example, if I want to review only new N4 words, I won’t have all my N4 words in the review. That way I can target some words without doing all the deck reviews.
I’d love a way to set furigana to show based on your own learned vocabulary on Bunpro, perhaps by SRS level. At a certain point, you should definitely be familiar enough with the word SRS-wise that you shouldn’t need it, and right now you can only really do that manually.
Or… a tool that works like changing your review style that applies the furigana setting by SRS which processes all your current vocab learned.
Would it be possible to send someone an anonymous invitation to join Bunpro?
I mean without the invitation showing them your Bunpro username / profile.
Could we get a “related vocabulary” comparison like what we have for grammar? The yellow hints could be used/organized for this purpose. But, in addition to being “hidden” behind review attempts, they would be compiled and shown on the vocab page.
Currently, I tend to use AI to ask for such comparison:
Group the order of the Zodiac signs into one closer section in N1 instead of sporadically spreading them out across N1/N2. The sentences in the Zodiac signs commonly reference the other signs so it would be more helpful to learn them at once. But maybe there’s a reason it’s the way it is.
what happened to the ability in the review settings menu to have vocab reviews default to listening or reading mode? im currently adding vocab without using a deck and they all get added as flashcards and i have to change each one to listening/reading manually.
Suggestion:
When a vocab item has multiple correct readings, accept those readings as correct answers.
Recent example:
For 的確 (JLPT N3) | Bunpro, Bunpro only accepts てきかく, even though the page itself lists both てきかく and てっかく as correct readings/spellings. I believe most vocab items that have multiple readings will currently only be marked correct when entering the first reading Bunpro lists, but I’m sure I’ve come across a handful of items where a second reading is also accepted. I think all correct readings should be accepted. Maybe with an exception for readings that are very rare.
