You know, I think that is it. And you want to hear something funny? I’ve been in like 1 hour of conversation with 3 different LLMs about this topic before posting here. And the very first link that ChatGPT gave me an hour ago was… that link. But I argued back with it at the time, and then went through a million other bad answers before coming here.
My bad argument at the time was that the lesson says:
the nuance is quite often that ‘(A) allowed/led to (B)’
And I argued that “being independent does not allow living”. But when I think now instead of “by means of” or a tool… then it’s easy to think of “being independent” as a tool that one lives by the means of. And it also fits nicely with my belief that this is an adverbial usage, which I still believe despite it not being called out anywhere explicitly.
These things are much harder to visualize when it’s a stative verb. Compare “living by means of being independent” vs “traveling by means of riding a bike”. The former is so much more abstract. I think I’m also realizing that maybe I’ve always viewed “living” as a binary, passive thing (alive or not), whereas this concept treats it more as an active continuous state.
ありがとう ! 