お送りさせていただくって言うのは、間違いだってはるなが言った。理由は、2つの敬語があるから。これを読んで表れます。
It’s double keigo, and although lots of people use it, apparently it is considered wrong. Almost similar to how lots of English native speakers say things like
‘I don’t like ___ neither’ etc.
Wrong, but so often said that some consider it right.
Just read through a few of the business emails my wife is working through at work, it is literally, without exception, always お送りさせて頂く.
I’m in 2 minds about what to think about this. On the one hand, it is so pervasive that its practically not even considered a mistake in business Japanese, however on the other hand it actually is wrong so should be avoided. What chance do learners have??
Like you said, it is wrong, so my suggestion would be to have it as a potential ‘right’ answer, but with the stipulation that it is wrong (in the orange text)
Also keep in mind that in higher level business situations, people get in trouble for misusing keigo quite often (well… Not in trouble, but left feeling embarassed). I had a client a few days ago that told me that he had to apologize to his subordinate, because he accused him of making a keigo error in his report, but when he showed a higher level boss, that guy said that the subordinate was actually correct. So in the end, my client tried to call out another persons error, and ended up getting schooled in keigo himself. Hahah.
I have another grammar point to add that I couldn’t find: using んだ as a rough command. Examples: 聞くんだ (you should listen) 逃げるんだ (you should run away). It’s used quite often in anime, but not many sites or textbooks teach it.
やめるんだバイキンマン！
(sorry)
And here’s another bunch of grammar points from me.
Yeah, no matter how much you add there’s still plenty left 
PS - first post is also updated.
TIL I’m no one 
I take it we’re not talking about the sentence final ぞ. Where do you see this?
Likewise, never seen this before.
That’s not ぞう though
強 and 弱 can be used to say just over or just under a given number, so 100弱 is “just under 100”. It can be used for times as well like “just under an hour” - “1時間弱”
行くぞ～！
A grammar point I ran into the other day which I couldn’t find here is using the continuative form of a verb followed by a 、.
Edit: Here’s a page on imabi that explains it. https://www.imabi.net/renyouchuushikei.htm
I found a sentence-ending ぞう but I don’t think it’s useful enough for bunpro:
ぞう・ざう
〘連語〙 （「…に候」の意の「にそう」の変化したもの。一説に、助動詞とも） …でございます。…です。
＊謡曲・自然居士（1423頃）
「その舟漕ぐ櫂のことざうよ」
＊浄瑠璃・源頼家源実朝鎌倉三代記（1781）六
「御成りぞふと呼はって、襖披かせ立ち出る御大将時政公」
Interesting! Definitely not what the OP of this point meant though surely. This piece of grammar doesn’t even appear on eow.alc.co.jp which firmly makes me think it is obsolete.
I am missing the ては from Tobira:
The ては that is currently listed in the Tobira grammar path is a completely different grammar point.
@Melanthe
Hey 
This grammar point is already on bunpro:
We will replace the wrong lesson in the tobira path 
Cheers!
@mrnoone hey, sorry to ping you, but I just wanted to ask if what I’m posting here is useful to you guys
I spend quite some time specifically compiling that list of grammar points, so I just want to know if it makes any sense for me to continue with it or not.
I.e. is this useful to you in any way, or are you not planning to use points from this list anyway and will only limit yourself to the grammar points present in formal textbooks?
Thanks! Perhaps related to the search bug that I couldn’t find it, hehe
