Why is there no Grammar Point for multiple adjectives in N5 grammar? As in:
い-Adjective - い + くて + Adjective 2
な-Adjective + で + Adjective 2
Or am I just blind? For some reason a lot of grammar resources don’t seem to cover this. Is it just uncommon or something?
Also I’m not seeing a Grammar Point for turning Adjectives into Adverbs. It’s sort of included in the “to become” Grammar Point but isn’t really pointed out as that you’re adverbializing the adjectives and adding なる.
Isnt this just the te-form of adjectives, used to join a sentence?
Genki covers it in lesson 7
Yeah, I already kind of know it but I was pointing out there isn’t a lesson on this site.
For the Feedback page: It would be nice to see clearly which ones are newly replied to. I have the “New!” message, but unless it’s something at the top, I have to scroll around and try to remember which ones I read or not to see what’s new.
@jeffusu @Kai @steford @opgjoh Thank you for your suggestions for Cram. Cram is something we want to overhaul at some point in the future to make its full potential available. I will add what you suggested to the idea board!
@Anthropos888 @conan I still have some things I want to tweak with the new feedback system and one of them is the option to see feedback just left as well as the option to order by latest reply/feedback.
@Anthropos888 Imperative verb would be good to have!
@eefara @MissDagger Added 
@Johnathan-Weir We will look into it!
This is for WAAY down the line, when all grammar points have been added and the site is polished to a blinding shine. I think a feature that helps you really get into the differences between similar looking/meaning/sounding grammar points would be great. The site does get into the differences with things like そう, らしい, みたい, etc; but not in one easy to access place. This becomes a real pain in N2, when nearly all grammar points are vaguely related to some other, worst case being this: "can't help but" Grammar Points.
Can we have stats for cram? like what percentage we achieve in each level?
Any chance ‘ProBun’ is going to happen?
Seeing a full Japanese sentence, a grammar point highlighted in yellow and having to fill in the meaning in an English sentence.
I do realize that such a system would be a lot of work if you were to try and add every possible english translation, but I feel like it would be a great addition to the ‘cram’ feature to add some diversity. In cram you could just leave it to the user to mark it as right or wrong.
I’d assume creating this out of the already existing sentences is probably just changing some code?
This just a silly little thing, but I would love study goals.
Something like “Finish N3 (including N5+N4) untill 2019.12.01”, “Finish Genki 1 untill 2019.05.10” and then showing you how many lessons you’d have to do each day to accomplish your goal.
Maybe hire the Duolingo bird to threaten people into studying.
@John_Doe Thank you for your suggestion! This is indeed one of the greatest challenges that we have faced and will continue to face going forward, so we want to make sure that we implement features that have the greatest benefit to you. Do you have some ideas about how you would want this displayed? Do you feel that the related grammar feature is lacking in some ways (we have some ideas of ways to improve it)? Were you thinking of having something appear in reviews? Any suggestions you may have would be greatly appreciated. Cheers!
@hamigakiko Expanding stats for Cram is on our to-do list. We also have plans for improving your regular stats page. Stay tuned. Cheers!
@xBl4ck ProBun© is something that have tinkered with and would like to try to implement in the future. Once we have expanded Japanese content and implemented some new features, we think that adding some diversity to your reviews will be beneficial. Having something like study goals and gated reviews (unlocking levels, etc.) are options that we would like to add. Thank you for your suggestions. Cheers!
This is inspired by a YouTube video, but I can’t find it, unfortunately.
The idea is to cram newly learned grammar points (GPs). It often happens to me that I remember what a GP means, how use it/conjugate it, everything, except how it goes. As in, which letters I need to use. I know I need to add “as ~ as possible,” but I forgot how it goes. Is it なろく? なるべき? Etc. (it’s なるべく). And I would really use a way to get over those initial failures. And the Cram feature doesn’t let me be as specific and doesn’t really work in a way I’d want it to.
What I would like is for me to be able to pick which GPs I want to practice. Any number of them, thought this method doesn’t work if you only pick a few. So let’s say I pick 5, all of which I’ve just learned. This new feature would present them first in Japanese, for instance (ideally it would be random in which language it show them first). All five at once, in one column. The second column would leave room for me to write in, but it’s optional if I do. I.e. I would decide if I’m right, not the site (like in Anki).
When I’m done writing in, or just thinking without writing, I would click “Done,” when the site would show the right answers in English in a third column, and then give me the option to click “Correct” or “Wrong.” I would only click “Correct” if I got all 5 right. If not, then I would repeat the exercise. If I’m right about all five, the site would then put the English meaning in the first column. Then I would have to guess all five again, but E->J. And the whole process would repeat and as for as long as I wanted it to.
Or if you just made it so that Cram feature let’s you pick which GPs you can study, lmao, probably easier to set up than this, but on the other hand, it might make memorizing sentences instead of grammar easier.
Regarding the similar grammar points: The best idea I have so far is to do what you’ve already done here and there. There are already those orange descriptions in lessons which sometimes tell you “X is a more formal version of Y.” Which is great, but for all those youna, souna, mitaina etc. ones for instance, that’s not all there is to it. It’s also about visual cues etc. But some of them share these traits, so I still struggle with differentiating them. I think the general idea of orange descriptions in lessons is good, but the descriptions of the differences need to be more specific somehow? Or maybe incorporate examples that really show how and and why exactly you can’t use one of them in one context and have to use the other.
Alternatively, since this might be too long for orange descriptions, I would maybe, in the orange descriptions, link the best resource you can find which explains as clearly as possible and with examples, the differences between the similar GPs. (And not in the “Reading” section, because, knowing myself, I’d be too lazy to visit it, lmao - but also put it there)
Edit: This is, imo, how it should look ideally: http://nihongolearner.blogspot.com/2013/01/vs-tokoro-vs-bakari.html
@Nenad Thank you so much for your insight! We will see what we can do about including more specific descriptions of the subtle differences between similar grammar points. We also like your idea of adding the additional reading links to the hints that appear in reviews. Cheers!
Not sure if this is consistent through all the quizzes of the grammar point, but wouldn’t it be better to include the verb in the quiz, even if it isn’t conjugated?
Knowing that it isn’t conjugated is still important after all 
Thank you for the response. Speaking strictly from what I personally would prefer: I think it’d be good if similar grammar points could have their own section like “study” and “cram”. There, we could compare the points more in depth, maybe even have a review mode which tests the specific nuances of grammar point “families”. There’s something about comparing similar items side by side that makes it stick, kind of like how a lot of us nailed the difference between 牛 and 午 just by looking at them side by side.
Yes, like how you already present things, but each box would represent a “family”. So these boxes could say “however”, “despite”, “although”, “according to”, “looks like/seems like/appears like”, “can’t help”, “emphasis”.
Anything lacking has to do with it not being the biggest priority right now, which i’m assuming is adding more grammar points and polishing the site. Though if I nitpick, one thing I find lacking is how these similar grammar points are thoroughly analyzed and explained, but the only place you could find it is on the forums. I think the main site would benefit greatly from @mrnoone’s explanations already on these forums. It’s probably that way to prevent cluttering the site, so maybe this would be useful in the similar grammar section?
Sorry, but I can’t think of anything on that.
I imagine rounding up all these grammar point groups would be very difficult, is there any way we could help? Maybe make a thread and we all can share the groups that give us trouble? Kind of like how information was collected in this thread? https://community.wanikani.com/t/the-nuance-thread/33759/12
Sorry if I come off as “you should make it like this and that”, these are just my personal suggestions and I’m sure there are people who have radically different and better ideas.
Great job on running the site, actively listening to feature requests and implementing suggestions. As this thread grows past 500, I’m not sure how many requests are reasonable given BP’s resources as well as actively building N1 material, adding to current levels, etc…you guys look really busy. I’ve personally endorsed the idea of growing the listening/reading aspects this site could provide…there are some many possibilities that could make this site even more special as it continues to improve.
I’d like to see BP make more money so as many requests listed already may become a reality. In order to do so, I think BP could be better in attracting beginner learners. For those on the WK, how many times have we heard “when should I start grammar/start BP to supplement my kanji study?” or “I’m moving to Japan and I need to cram!” For individuals who need survivalist Japanese (whose primary goal is not to read novels or pass JLPT), I’d like to see BP as the PRIMARY resource with kanji study used to supplement their BP grammar study. I also imagine that beginner subscribers are likely a higher revenue source, probably more so than the intermediate/expert levelers.
Note these are not just personal requests but ideas that could campaign to early learners better (to get more subscribers ($)):
Just some random thoughts but thanks for listening!
Adding on to this, I think another good addition would be like the old WK help/about pages, where they dumb down explain things in simple, but encouraging, terms, as well as give you an idea of what you can do when you reach certain points of their service. (Having those details about when to start reading practice, what to do once you reach something, how much you can read, etc., was REALLY motivating back when I first started WK. I read that section quite often tbh x’D)
Agreed wholeheartedly; if I’m typing or speaking, I have to know that the verb is left in 辞書形 if I want to use that grammar correctly.
So please, make me type it out 
Then, when they make this, they can finally have a place on the site to say what the heck 硬 means when you’re looking at grammar points!
(It means “formal”)
Given enough time, grouping similar (or easily-confused) grammar points should be extremely trivial; all they’d have to do is examine the alternate answers each grammar point catches 
Pandering to “learners” that don’t even care to learn kana is how a great resource like the Dictionary of Basic Japanese Grammar can become an eyesore. Granted, since Bunpro is on the Internet it can be an option and it’s not as big a deal. But whenever I see a grammar resource written in romaji I’m at a loss, because I can’t figure out who the website is actually targeted towards.
