Thank you for the response. Speaking strictly from what I personally would prefer: I think itâd be good if similar grammar points could have their own section like âstudyâ and âcramâ. There, we could compare the points more in depth, maybe even have a review mode which tests the specific nuances of grammar point âfamiliesâ. Thereâs something about comparing similar items side by side that makes it stick, kind of like how a lot of us nailed the difference between ç and ć just by looking at them side by side.
Yes, like how you already present things, but each box would represent a âfamilyâ. So these boxes could say âhoweverâ, âdespiteâ, âalthoughâ, âaccording toâ, âlooks like/seems like/appears likeâ, âcanât helpâ, âemphasisâ.
Not sure if this is an issue for others, but maybe include similar looking/sounding grammar points like
or things with äž, ăăź, etc.
Anything lacking has to do with it not being the biggest priority right now, which iâm assuming is adding more grammar points and polishing the site. Though if I nitpick, one thing I find lacking is how these similar grammar points are thoroughly analyzed and explained, but the only place you could find it is on the forums. I think the main site would benefit greatly from @mrnooneâs explanations already on these forums. Itâs probably that way to prevent cluttering the site, so maybe this would be useful in the similar grammar section?
Sorry, but I canât think of anything on that.
I imagine rounding up all these grammar point groups would be very difficult, is there any way we could help? Maybe make a thread and we all can share the groups that give us trouble? Kind of like how information was collected in this thread? https://community.wanikani.com/t/the-nuance-thread/33759/12
Sorry if I come off as âyou should make it like this and thatâ, these are just my personal suggestions and Iâm sure there are people who have radically different and better ideas.